homeric question การใช้

• His work was influential ( see Homeric scholarship # Oral Theory and Homeric Question ).
• The total sum of all the problems is known as the Homeric question, which is, of course, generic and not singular.
• Another important source that feeds into A is a group of scholia on mythographical and allegorical topics, derived from Porphyry's " Homeric Questions ".
• Start with our main article on Homer, then Homeric Question and go from there .-- talk ) 10 : 47, 18 February 2015 ( UTC)
• The hypotheses of Milman Parry and Albert Lord on the Homeric Question came to be applied ( by Parry and Lord, but also by Francis Magoun ) to verse written in Old English.
• His monograph " Homeric questions " seems to have analyzed continuity errors in Homer, but also criticized the impropriety of Homer's depiction of gods indulging in allegedly inappropriate behavior.
• The Homeric question is essentially the question of the identity of the poet ( s ) of the Homeric epics, and the nature of the relationship between " Homer " and the epics.
• In his studies of the Homeric Question, Milman Parry was able to show that the poetic metre found in the Iliad and the Odyssey had been'packaged'by oral Greek society to meet its information management needs.
• The 18th century saw major developments in Homeric scholarship, and also saw the opening phase of the discussion which was to dominate the 19th century ( and, for some scholars, the 20th ) : the so-called " Homeric question ".
• The various facets of the Homeric question, along with other historical, linguistic, and literary material, are treated in Bernard Knox's introduction to Fagles's " Odyssey, " an essay that is a model of clarity and concision.
• The "'Homeric Question "'concerns the doubts and consequent debate over the identity of Homer, the authorship of the " Iliad " and " Odyssey ", and their Homeric scholars of the 19th and 20th centuries.
• The first philosopher to focus intensively on the intellectual problems surrounding the Homeric epics was Zoilus of Amphipolis in the early 4th century BCE . His work " Homeric Questions " does not survive, but it seems that Zoilus enumerated and discussed inconsistencies of plot in Homer.
• Odysseus's kingdom includes Ithaca, Same, Dulichium, and Zacynthus, the Catalogue of Ships contains a different list of islands, again Ithaca, Same, and Zacynthus but now also Neritum, Krocylea, and Aegilips . The separate debate over the identity of Homer and the authorship of the " Iliad " and the " Odyssey " is conventionally termed " the Homeric Question ".
• However, the " Homeric questions " led to his name becoming a byword for harsh and malignant criticism : in antiquity he gained the name " Homeromastix ", " scourge of Homer "; in the modern period, Cervantes calls Zoilus a " slanderer " in the preface to Don Quixote and there is also a ( now disused ) proverb, " Every poet has his Zoilus . " Since his writings do not survive, it is impossible to know whether this caricature is justified.
• Some of the main trends in modern Homeric scholarship have been, in the 19th and early 20th centuries, " Analysis " and " Unitarianism " ( see Homeric Question ), schools of thought which emphasized on the one hand the inconsistencies in, and on the other the artistic unity of, Homer; and in the 20th century and later " Oral Theory ", the study of the mechanisms and effects of oral transmission, and " Neoanalysis ", the study of the relationship between Homer and other early epic material.
• Thus, asking, " did Homer write the Iliad and Odyssee ? " is tautological  the answer is " yes ", by definition . ( Put it this way : if " some other person " wrote them, then by definition that other person would " be " " Homer " . ) The only conceivable way in which the answer could be " no " is if " nobody " wrote those works  i . e . if they were created by two different people, or created in a way that didn't involve individualized " authorship " at all ( purely through anonymous oral compilation, etc . ) But as far as I know, the current predominant opinion in scholarship is still that there was an individualized act of creation by a single individual ( but see Homeric question for details ).